English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 26988/38789
Visitors : 2318090      Online Users : 33
RC Version 4.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Adv. Search

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ntour.ntou.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/987654321/46735

Title: 從Henry A. Giroux對Michel Foucault權力/知識觀的詮釋省思Giroux課程理論的權力/知識
Authors: 王嘉陵(Chia-Ling Wang)
Contributors: 國立臺灣海洋大學:應用經濟研究所
Date: 2012
Issue Date: 2018-06-04T03:21:59Z
Publisher: 市北教育學刊
Abstract: 摘要:本文主要在探討Giroux對Foucault的權力/知識概念的運用,此動機起始於Foucault的權力/知識觀點常被教育學者誤解,課程理論中亦不乏此種情形,作者檢視Giroux在詮釋權力/知識概念時,與Foucault本人闡述此概念的相異之處。Giroux對權力/知識的思考是基於現代性的觀點,而Foucault則是抱持後現代的觀點,兩者的哲學立場有其差異,以致於Giroux看待權力是抱持二分的對立觀點,但Foucault則是對權力抱持動態、多樣態的看法;不只是看待權力/知識的角度不同,Giroux與Foucault在對於理性價值的態度上也有極大差異,前者是一元論者,後者則是多元論者。除了揭露Giroux的課程語言如何受限於特定真理外,作者也試著透過權力/知識的角度來思考Giroux課程理論背後的權力/知識形構,目的除了在釐清權力/知識這個概念的意涵之外,也同時以多元論觀點解構Giroux單一理性的課程理論。

Abstract: This paper starts from an examination of Giroux's employment of Foucault's concept of power/knowledge. The general thrust of this paper is that curriculum theorists tend to see the notion of power/knowledge from a narrow perspective. I suggest that Giroux has not only a different way of seeing the nature of power/knowledge but also a different value of reason from that of Foucault. Giroux is a monist, but Foucault is a pluralist. Giroux considers power/knowledge on the basis of the tradition of modernity. However, Foucault's thought broadly adopts the postmodernist view. This is the reason why Giroux sees the nature of power as a domination/liberation binary division. Yet Foucault tends to see the exercise of power as plural and dynamic rather than a dichotomy. Their diverse standpoints result in not only different models of power/knowledge but also different approaches to practicing social critique. I portray Giroux's work as being governed by a sovereign truth-a concept of reason as liberating. This reason, in turn, is also a usual and fashionable way from which educators view curriculum theories. Examining Giroux's curriculum theories with pluralism, I attempt to clarify the significance of power/knowledge and to deconstruct Giroux's singular reason curriculum perspective.
Relation: 42 pp.53 - 74
URI: http://ntour.ntou.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/987654321/46735
Appears in Collections:[應用經濟研究所] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat

All items in NTOUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


著作權政策宣告: 本網站之內容為國立臺灣海洋大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,請合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。
網站維護: 海大圖資處 圖書系統組
DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback