English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 26988/38789
Visitors : 2351326      Online Users : 37
RC Version 4.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Adv. Search
LoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ntour.ntou.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/987654321/35255

Title: 國會比例代表制之法理研究-以議席的正當代表性為中心
A Legal Analysis on Parliamentary Proportional Representation – Focused on the Legitimate Representation of Parliamentary Seats
Authors: Hui-Yun Hsu
徐慧芸
Contributors: NTOU:Institute of the Law of the Sea
國立臺灣海洋大學:海洋法律研究所
Keywords: 代議政治;比例代表制;單一選區兩票制;政黨提名
representative democracy;proportional representative;the single-member district and two-vote system;legislator-at large
Date: 2012
Issue Date: 2013-10-07T02:52:46Z
Abstract: 國會議員的選舉制度,是代議民主之憲政體制的中樞神經,其間之制度安排,會對憲政體制的運作產生深遠的影響。我國第一屆到第六屆的立法委員選舉制度是用「單記不可讓渡制(SNTV)」,為「有限投票制」,選區應選的名額多於一位,但選區的選民只能投一票,並依照得票高低決定席次。自第七屆開始改為「單一選區兩票制」,選民有兩票,一票選人,一票選黨。然而「不分區代表」也就是國會比例代表,代表的是政黨的黨意或是選民之民意,其正當代表性的意義仍是曖昧不明。 本文研究是先說明代議政治、比例代表制遵循之法理,再將德日澳紐比例代表制度和我國比例代表制度實際運作內涵作分析探討,進而提出我國比例代表制度存在問題,並提出意見,期能對現今「單一選區兩票制」有些許影響的力量與幫助。
The electoral system of legislators is the nucleus of the modern representative constitutionalism within democratic society of which several arrangements would possibly have great influence on the functioning of constitutional system. Legislator’s election in Taiwan had long adopted the SNTV which is a limited voting system form its first to sixth, that is, while every electorate can only cast single ballot by which decides which candidate acquires higher vote, more than one of whom will turn out to be elected. Yet, ever since the 7th election for legislators in Taiwan, the electoral system has changed into “the single-member district and two-vote system” where every electorate has two votes that one for the candidate, the other for his favorite party. However, the system of legislator-at large which represents the opinion of his party or his people indeed is the proportional representative. Therefore, its meaning and legitimacy remains controversial. This study starts from elaborating the representative democracy, than analyze the regime of proportional representative, to cross-examine and comparatively analyze the systems of German, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and Taiwan. Further, the author aims to indentify the existing problems of the system and provide solution for the development of current “the single-member district and two-vote system.”
URI: http://ethesys.lib.ntou.edu.tw/cdrfb3/record/#G0T98460013
http://ntour.ntou.edu.tw/handle/987654321/35255
Appears in Collections:[海洋法律研究所] 博碩士論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
index.html0KbHTML90View/Open


All items in NTOUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

 


著作權政策宣告: 本網站之內容為國立臺灣海洋大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,請合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。
網站維護: 海大圖資處 圖書系統組
DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback