English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 26987/38787
Visitors : 2289422      Online Users : 38
RC Version 4.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Adv. Search
LoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ntour.ntou.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/987654321/33044

Title: Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry determination of feminizing chemicals in river water, sediment and tissue pretreated using disk-type solid-phase extraction and matrix solid-phase dispersion
Authors: Wen-Ling Chen;Gen-Shuh Wang;Jin-Chywan Gwo;Chia-Yang Chen
Contributors: 國立臺灣海洋大學:水產養殖系
Keywords: Feminizing chemicals;Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry;Disk-type automated solid-phase extraction;Matrix solid-phase dispersion
Date: 2012-01-30
Issue Date: 2012-10-01T02:40:51Z
Publisher: Talanta
Abstract: Abstract:This study developed and validated a method of measuring the feminizing chemicals 4-tert-octylphenol, 4-nonylphenol, nonylphenol monoethoxycarboxylate (NP1EC), nonylphenol monoethoxylate (NP1EO), nonylphenol diethoxylate (NP2EO), estrone, 17β-estradiol, estriol, 17α-ethinyl estradiol and bisphenol A in river water, sediment, and tissue using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC/MS/MS) and isotope-dilution techniques. Water samples were pretreated using disk-type automated solid-phase extraction (SPE). Solid samples of sediment, fish, and clams were treated with matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) using C8 adsorbent. Eluents were directly passed following alumina cartridges for cleanup. The signal intensity of analytes on electrospray ionization (ESI) was compared with that of atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI). The analytes were separated on a UHPLC C18 column with aqueous 10-mM ammonium acetate for NPEOs and aqueous 10-mM N-methylmorpholine for the other compounds. On-line cleanup was evaluated using two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2-D LC).

ESI could provide satisfactory response for all of the analytes. Though APPI did not offer suitable response for NP1EO, NP2EO and NP1EC, it provided better signal intensities for the steroid estrogens (1.0-2.4 times) and the phenols (3.2–4.4 times) than ESI. UHPLC shortened chromatographic time to less than 10 min. Disk-type automated SPE and MSPD dramatically increased the throughput of sample preparation. The extraction efficiency on surface water samples ranged from 10% to 91%. The extraction efficiency of MSPD on sediment, fish, and clams was 51-101%, 36-109%, and 30-111%, respectively. Acidic alumina cleanup was essential for the analysis of the tissue sample, and reduced matrix effects better than 2-D LC on-line cleanup. The limits of detection (LODs) in water ranged from 0.81 ng/L to 89.9 ng/L. The LODs in sediment and tissue ranged from tens of pg/g wet weight to only a few ng/g wet weight. This method proved to be accurate and reproducible, as both quantitative biases and relative deviations remained smaller than 20% at three spiked levels.
Relation: 89, pp.237-245
URI: http://ntour.ntou.edu.tw/handle/987654321/33044
Appears in Collections:[水產養殖學系] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
index.html0KbHTML356View/Open


All items in NTOUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

 


著作權政策宣告: 本網站之內容為國立臺灣海洋大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,請合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。
網站維護: 海大圖資處 圖書系統組
DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback