English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 26988/38789
Visitors : 2356437      Online Users : 36
RC Version 4.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Adv. Search
LoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ntour.ntou.edu.tw:8080/ir/handle/987654321/24535

Title: Comments on “The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation problem” [S.Y. Zhang, X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772]
Authors: J.T. Chen;I.L. Chen;Y.T. Lee
Contributors: NTOU:Department of Harbor and River Engineering
國立臺灣海洋大學:河海工程學系
Date: 2008-03-04
Issue Date: 2011-10-20T08:12:38Z
Publisher: Journal of Sound and Vibration
Abstract: Abstract:Zhang and Chen [The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation problem, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228 (1999) 761–772] proposed a boundary point method (BPM) for exterior acoustic problems. The idea is similar to the CHUNKY CHIEF by Wu [A weighted residual formulation for the CHIEF method in acoustic, Journal of Acoustical Society of America 90 (1991) 1608–1614], but Chunky CHIEF provides constraints using null-field equations while the BPM used the CHUNKY BLOCK singularity outside the domain. The mathematical structure is similar to Trefftz method and method of fundamental solutions [J.T. Chen et al., On the equivalence of the Trefftz method and method of fundamental solutions for Laplace and biharmonic equations, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 53 (2007) 851–879], since the interpolation function satisfies the governing equation. Later, Wu commented twice [Sean F. Wu, Comments on “The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation” (by S.Y. Zhang, X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772), Journal of Sound and Vibration, 298 (2006) 1173]; Sean F. Wu, Comments on “Reply to the comments on ‘The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation’ (by S.Y. Zhang, X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772)”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 298 (2006) 1176–1177] that the formulation of BPM is wrong and the authors replied also twice [X.Z. Chen, C.X. Bi, Reply to the comments on “The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation” (by S.Y. Zhang, X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772), Journal of Sound and Vibration, 298 (2006) 1174–1175; [X.Z. Chen, C.X. Bi, Reply to the comments on “Reply to the comments on ‘The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation’ (by S.Y. Zhang, X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772)”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 298 (2006) 1178–1179] to defend themselves. Here, we would like to say a few words for the discussions in two aspects. One is the formulation, and the other is the occurrence of fictitious frequencies.
Relation: 310(4-5), pp.1167-1169
URI: http://ntour.ntou.edu.tw/handle/987654321/24535
Appears in Collections:[河海工程學系] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
index.html0KbHTML220View/Open


All items in NTOUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

 


著作權政策宣告: 本網站之內容為國立臺灣海洋大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,請合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。
網站維護: 海大圖資處 圖書系統組
DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback